Dreiske v. People's Lumber Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill for an Injunction.—Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes
A preliminary question is suggested by counsel for plaintiffs in error, though it is not argued by counsel for defendant in error, viz., whether error will lie because the bill was not formally dismissed. The only relief asked by the bill was for an injunction, and that being dissolved, was in effect a disposition of the whole case, and equivalent to a dismissal of the bill. Even plaintiffs in error might have had the bill dismissed on their own motion after a dissolution of the injunction. Titus v. Mabee, 25 Ill. 257; Prout v. Lomer, 79 Ill. 331; Williams v. C. E. Co., 188 Ill. 19, and cases…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Titus v. MabeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Watriss v. First National Bank of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- First National Bank of Joliet v. AdamIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Talbot v. . CrugerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Williams v. Chicago Exhibition Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Savage v. University State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Revzen Business Interiors, Inc. v. CarraneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Getzendaner v. ErbsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
- Getzendaner v. ErbsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950