Legal Opinion

Scott v. Richstein

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 3, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

129 N.J. Super. 516 (1974)

324 A.2d 106

MARIE B. SCOTT, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ABE RICHSTEIN, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided July 3, 1974.

Mr. Barry Knopf for plaintiff (Messrs. Cohn and Liftland, attorneys, Mr. Peter S. Pearlman on the brief).

Mr. Edward M. Gurry for defendant (Messrs. Gurry and Conlan, attorneys; Mr. Thomas P. McHugh on the brief).

JOELSON, A.J.S.C.

This is a motion brought by defendant to dismiss a complaint by reason of R. 4:28-3(b).

Plaintiff and her husband were involved in an automobile accident with defendant. The husband, who was a passenger in a car…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ekalo v. Constructive Service Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tornquist v. PerkowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  2. Richardson v. KulickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API