Birnbaum v. Flaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Decree unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: It was not an abuse of discretion, under the circumstances, for the Surrogate to grant in part the application of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan without a hearing pursuant to SCPA 2110 and to direct the temporary coadministrators to pay to them the sum of $200,000 as an interim partial payment on account for "third-party” services rendered to the estate (see, Matter of Anonymous, 60 Misc 2d 163; Matter of Wheeler, 25 Misc 2d 933, affd 14 AD2d 549). Nor did the Surrogate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Estate of BellingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re Della ChiesaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- In re the Estate of AnonymousNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
- In re the Accounting of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- Birnbaum v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wallace v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Birnbaum v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- National Wildlife Federation v. FosterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Birnbaum v. FlaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.