Burrell v. Burrell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
*1194We affirm. “[A]n existing visitation order will be modified only if the applicant demonstrates a change in circumstances that reflects a genuine need for the modification so as to ensure the best interests of the child” (Matter of Taylor v Fry, 63 AD3d 1217, 1218 [2009]; accord Matter of Susan LL. v Victor LL., 88 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2011]). Moreover, “[t]he determination of whether visitation should be supervised is a matter left to Family Court’s sound discretion and it will not be disturbed as long as there is a sound and substantial basis in the record to support it” (Matter of Taylor v Fry,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flood v. FloodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Taylor v. FryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Knight v. KnightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- DeRuzzio v. RugglesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Susan LL. v. Victor LL.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Keen v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Adam E. v. Heather F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Christina KK. v. Kathleen LL.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Raychelle J. v. Kendell K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- LaRussa v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.