Legal Opinion

Allen v. Harkins

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 17, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00964Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MATTHEW ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:20cv964 (JAM) JOHN HARKINS, Defendant. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) Plaintiff Matthew Allen has filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against defendant John Harkins. Because it appears that the complaint does not allege facts that give rise to plausible grounds for relief, the Court issues this order to show cause for Allen to file a response by July 24, 2020. BACKGROUND On July 13, 2020, Allen filed a pro se…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Abbas v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Fowlkes v. Ironworkers Local 40Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. John Betts v. Martha Anne ShearmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API