Legal Opinion

Borden v. Peay

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Pulaski County. Hon. Holbert F. Fairchild, Chancellor. The bill alleges, by way of avoidance of the Statute of Limitations as to Chase, that be was a Trustee for the Bank, and that it was his duty to have collected the note sought to be recovered in this suit. This would not avail the complainant anything, because, as the proof shoWs, he did not become Trustee until the month of May, 1840, before which time the note was barred.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Pulaski County. Hon. Holbert F. Fairchild, Chancellor. The bill alleges, by way of avoidance of the Statute of Limitations as to Chase, that be was a Trustee for the Bank, and that it was his duty to have collected the note sought to be recovered in this suit. This would not avail the complainant anything, because, as the proof shoWs, he did not become Trustee until the month of May, 1840, before which time the note was barred. Faulkner et al. vs. Thompson ei al. 14 Ark. Rep. 480; Grant ad. vs. Ashley cj- Buchanan, 7 Eng. Rep. 702. More than three years had…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice

English delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of Pulaski county.

The bill was brought in the name of Biscoe and others, as Trustees of the Peal Estate Bank under the deed of assignment.

During the progress of the cause, Gordon N. Peay was substituted as complainant, the Trusteeshaving been removed, and he appointed Receiver, by an order of the Chancellor. The defendants were Benjamin J. Borden, Wm. B. Borden, James Lawson, Luther Chase and Philip 1L. Anthony. The object of the bill was to recover the balance due upon two notes…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shannon v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Lyon v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Slagle v. BoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Squier v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API