Baker v. State
Supreme Court of Vermont
1ConcurrenceDooley, J.
I concur in Part I of the majority opinion, the holding of Part II, and the mandate. I do not, however, concur in the reasoning of Part II. I recognize that to most observers the significance of this decision lies in its result and remedy. In the cases that come before us in the future, however, the significance of this case will he in its rationale — that is, how we interpret and apply Chapter I, Article 7 of the Vermont Constitution. Moreover, in this, the most closely-watched opinion in this Court’s history, its acceptability will be based on whether its reasoning and result are clearly…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.