Mott v. De Nisco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Emma L. B. Mott, from.au interlocutory judgment, of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered m the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 5th day of March, 1904, upon the decision of the court, rendered: after a trial at the Westchester Special Term, overruling the plaintiff’s ■ demurrer to the first, second, third, fourth and fifth separate defenses. contained in the defendant’s answer. ,
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from -an interlocutory judgment overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to each of the first five separate defenses, contained in defendant’s answer. The complaint alleges that Emma L. *155B. Oappelmann on the lOtli of June, 1895, was married to the •defendant, and at that time owned a large amount of property, •describing it; that at the time of her marriage she was sixty-nine years of age, arid defendant was thirty-three; that she was and had been for several years in feeble health, and the defendant was a laborer at small wages, without means, was of foreign birth, and could…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Thompson v. . HalbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Matthews v. BeachThe Superior Court of New York City · 1841
- Sbarboro v. Health DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Matthews v. Moses S.New York Court of Appeals · 1853
3Cited by4 opinions
- Browning, King & Co. v. TerwilligerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Thistle v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Jackson v. PesciaNew York Supreme Court · 1909
- Paul v. Cosmopolitan Bank, New York County Courts1915