Lee v. Sullivan
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CURRAN, District Judge.
Counsel for Dolores Lee, the plaintiff in the above-captioned social security action, has filed a “Motion for Attorneys Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [EAJA], 28 U.S.C. Section 2412(E) (sic), and 42 U.S.C. Section 406.” Lee’s attorney asks this court to order the Secretary to pay him $3,564.00 in fees pursuant to the EAJA for 36.10 hours of work performed before the district court. Pursuant to the fee provision of the Social Security Act, he also seeks twenty-five percent of the past due benefits of $17,503.00 which are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- McGuire v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanrahan v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Wonders v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993