Legal Opinion
United States v. David A.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 3, 2006No. 04-2284PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act (“FJDA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-5042, requires that a juvenile who has been charged with a crime occurring after his sixteenth birthday and who “has previously been found guilty of an act which if committed by an adult” would fall within a specific category of offenses, must be transferred to the district court to be tried as an adult. 18 U.S.C. § 5032. In this appeal, we consider the proper procedures applicable to such a mandatory transfer under § 5032. We conclude that 1) the Government’s filing a transfer motion tolls the juvenile’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Scott Robinson, United States of America v. James Scott RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Brian N. (A Juvenile Male), United States of America v. Craig J.B. (A Juvenile Male)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. A.R., a Male Juvenile, A.R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Under SealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. B.N.M.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Y.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. C.P.A.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.