Papernik v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
In Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Republic Steel Corp., 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 301, 375 A.2d 1369 (1977), we held that stenographic costs incurred for the reproduction of the deposition of the claimant’s medical witness, which was presented into evidence before the referee, was a cost of litigation which could be assessed against the employer in favor of the prevailing claimant as a “. . . reasonable sum for costs incurred for . . . witnesses,” under Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1
This appeal presents the question whether, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Sims v. American Can CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Republic Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- J. R. Sales, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Harmar Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lindemuth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Boeing Vertol Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (County of Allegheny)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Boeing Vertol Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.