Legal Opinion

State v. Nessim

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 8, 1991No. 89-0514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

STONE, Judge.

We grant the state’s motion for rehearing en banc in order to maintain consistency with our prior opinion in State v. Quinn, 518 So.2d 474 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

The state has appealed a trial court order “granting defendant’s motion to dismiss” for outrageous governmental misconduct. The order did not discharge the defendant or contain language of “finality.” Therefore, it is facially a non-final order.

This court dismissed the appeal in this case on the authority of Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Russell, a civil ease,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. SaufleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. QuinnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FeagleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. NessimDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. STATE OF FLORIDA v. A. M. C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API