Legal Opinion

Catlin v. Tobias

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the following opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtEmott, J.

This is an action for goods sold and delivered to the defendant by Daniel O. Ketchum and Charles H. Cole, who were partners, under the firm of D. O. Ketchum & Co. The answer, without denying the sale and delivery of the merchandise, denies any indebtedness for the same. It then proceeds to allege, as a separate defence, a contract between the defendant and D. O. Ketchum & Co., for the sale and delivery of certain glassware in quantities and at periods specified in the contract; by which contract Ketchum & Co., in the event of their failing to perform, were to forfeit to the defendant two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Benedict v. HecoxNew York Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. LowderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. In re LentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Bainbridge Fund Ltd. v. the Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API