Legal Opinion

Schargel v. United Electric Light & Power Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 18, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

A pure question of fact was here presented which the trial court was entitled to determine as it did. It may well be that had we tried the cause, we might have arrived at a radically different judgment, but we do not consider that we are privileged to substitute the result which we might have reached in place of that of the court below. Indeed, this is now so well recognized in principle that it becomes perfectly needless to cite authority in support of the proposition, except perhaps to say with Mr. Justice Gaynor in McGlynn v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co. (128 App. Div. 866, 867; affd., 198 N.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGlynn v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. McGlynn v. . Nassau Electric Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ralph Modica, P. C. v. BattistaSuffolk County District Court · 1972
  2. Devonshire v. Stubbs, New York County Courts1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API