Legal Opinion

Goleski v. Fritz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2002No. 75S05-0205-CV-296PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that claims made by a patient's "representative" under the Medical Malpractice Act survive the death of the representative and pass to the representative's estate. Derivative claims for medical malpractice such as a claim by a spouse for loss of consortium generally survive the death of the claimant under the Survival Statute.

Factual and Procedural Background

Lawrence Vetter was admitted to Starke Memorial Hospital on March 21, 1995. He was treated by defendant physicians Walter Fritz, M.J. Subba Rao, Thach Nguyen, Usha Sharma, and Donald…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. ArnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Burnett v. MilnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Merimee v. BrumfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. WolfeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Jose v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Spangler v. BechtelIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Chamberlain v. WalpoleIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Atterholt v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Ellenwine v. FairleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Johnson v. EldridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API