Legal Opinion

Texas Midland Railroad v. Crowder

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Delta. Tried, below before Hon. L. A. Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

Suit by appellees against appellant do recover damages for the negligent killing of the husband and father of appellees. Defendant answered by general denial and contributory negligence. The cause was finally tried at the June term, 1900, and nesulted in a verdict for appellees.

Conclusions of Fact.—Appellant’s line of railway passed through the western portion of the corporate limits of the town of Cooper, and its ■depot and switch yards were within the corporate limits; its main line was ballasted with “gumbo,” which is black dirt, burned for the purpose of making…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tex. & Pac. R'y Co. v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. International & Great Northern Railroad v. NewburnTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. AikenTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. St. Louis, S. F. T. Ry. Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Dahmer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Crawford v. HiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. E. P. McKnight Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API