Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Kelling

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 14, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01264Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ROBERT J. HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-CV-1264 JEFFREY KELLING, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS Robert Hutchinson sued the defendants under various federal statutes and state common law. I dismissed Hutchinson’s claims against all of the defendants (except defendant A2LA) on the grounds that his claims were barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The claim against defendant A2LA was dismissed for failure to state a claim. The relevant background to this case can be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Montano v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Annete M. Allen, Shelley S. Burnette, Rahpre Newberry, and Earnest Leonard v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Anthony Gay v. Rakesh ChandraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API