Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Savinski v. Kimble

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 10, 1998No. 97-3356Published

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

Donald Savinski appeals an order quashing a writ of mandamus issued under § 19.37(1), Stats. Savinski argues that the denial of his request for his patient treatment records under Wisconsin's open records law,- §§ 19.31 to 19.39, STATS., was inadequate and, therefore, the writ should not have been quashed by the trial court. He also argues that the trial court erred by failing to conduct an in camera inspection of the records. We conclude the written denial of his request was sufficient under § 19.35(4)(a) and (b), STATS.; access to the records was properly denied under § 51.30(4)(d)l,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Newspapers, Inc. v. BreierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hathaway v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Beckon v. EmeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Mayfair Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. BaldarottaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Blum v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API