Smith v. Rodriguez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Although we affirm the order insofar as appealed from, we do so for reasons different from those relied upon by the Supreme Court. The appellants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In support of their motion, the appellants relied on, inter alia, the affirmed medical report of Dr. Gregory Montalbano. Dr. Montalbano, the appellants’ examining…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Hurtte v. Budget Roadside CareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Landman v. SarconaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Varghese v. RamcharitarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Varghese v. RamcharitarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013