State v. Stave
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary and theft arising out of the breaking and entering of a jewelry store in Crookston, Minnesota, on June 19, 1965. The issue is whether the testimony of accomplices was adequately corroborated under Minn. St. 634.04.
The only testimony directly implicating defendant was given by his wife’s two brothers, Raymond Delage and Lawrence Delage. Raymond was granted immunity from prosecution under § 609.09 at the request of the county attorney. Before defendant was tried Lawrence pled guilty to the burglary and was sentenced to prison.
It was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. SorgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. EliasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.