Legal Opinion

Schafer v. Tyroler

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to punish judgment debtor for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtLa Fetra, J.

The judgment creditor, having procured an order for the examination of the debtor, served the same on January 21,1916. This order contained the usual restraining clause under which the debtor was prohibited from disposing of his property. Subsequently the debtor appeared, submitted to examination and testified, among other things, that within a period of two weeks after the service of the order on him he received moneys in excess of the judgment herein for work done prior to the institution of the proceeding and disposed of the same in payment of wages to employees, rent, household expenses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kronold v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Mulford v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. In re the Examination of WymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fay Securities Co. v. BoweringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. 1101 Park Avenue Corp. v. CornellCity of New York Municipal Court · 1928
  3. In Re DziedzicUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API