Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Isaacs

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hetherington, S.

The contestants appealed from a decree of the surrogate denying their petition for leave to withdraw their waivers and consents executed and filed by them in the probate proceeding. On appeal the decree was unanimously affirmed, with costs payable by the appellants personally (245 App. Div. 728). Proponents and two other respondents resisted the appeal and must be regarded as the successful parties. In view of the language of the order of affirmance only one bill of costs is allowable. (DeLamater v. Carman, 2 Daly, 182; Matter of City of New York, 129 App. Div. 929; Matter of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Veeder v. . MudgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Ridabock v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Bremer v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1906
  4. De Lamater v. CarmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1867

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shapiro v. PuniaNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API