Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collins v. Excel Specialty Products

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 5, 2001No. CA 01-102Published

1DissentJohn Mauzy Pittman, Judge

A cardinal rule of statutory construction is to give effect to the intent of the legislature. To do so we first look at the plain language of the statute and, giving the words their plain and ordinary meaning, construe the statute just as it reads. Flowers v. Norman Oaks Construction, 68 Ark. App. 239, 6 S.W.3d 118 (1999). If the language of the statute is not ambiguous and plainly states the intent of the legislature, then we will look no further. Id.

Act 796 of 1993 made sweeping changes to the Arkansas workers’ compensation law. In so doing, the legislature, with crystalline clarity,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Lytle v. Arkansas Trucking ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Flowers v. Norman Oaks Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API