Legal Opinion

Alderman v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1951No. 17446PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

Petitioners filed this action in the court below, seeking to have partitioned certain described lands. Defendant filed an answer to the partitioning proceedings, in which she admitted that petitioners owned a one-half undivided interest in the land, but objected to the partitioning on the ground that the deed from defendant to petitioners conveying the one-half undivided interest in the land in question provided that the land should not be- “sold or disposed of without the written consent of the party of the first part,” and that she is ready and willing to repurchase the land…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. FagelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Dobbs v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. BischoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Williams v. AycockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Wiley v. WileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Kinnon v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API