Legal Opinion
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Haun
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 11, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.
E. G. Harman and D. W. Franklin, on motion of the Norfolk & Western Railway Company, were duly appointed, by different courts, special police officers under the provision of Code, section 3944, as amended by Acts 1930, chapter 353. They received no compensation from the Commonwealth, but were paid by the Norfolk & Western Railway Company. These officers were notified that coal, in interstate transit, had been repeatedly stolen from cars temporarily on a side-track in the Norfolk & Western Railway yards at Flat Top, Tazewell county, Virginia. Their superior officers instructed them to make an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sharp v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Deck v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Layne v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- McKain v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Moss v. Campbell's Creek RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Austin v. Paramount Parks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Winston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Glenmar Cinestate, Inc. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Krowka v. Colt Patent Fire Arm Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Yeatts v. MintonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.