Barker v. Leggett
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Per curiam
• On three occasions, the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri, construing statutes of that State, has ruled that plaintiff, his associates, and others who were claiming attorneys’ fees and expenses to- be a lien upon, and payable out of, the insurance restitution fund referred to in the complaint, had no lien thereon and were not entitled to be paid out of such fund.
In Aetna Insurance Co. v. O’Malley, 1938, 343 Mo. 1232, 124 S.W.2d 1164, 1168, that Court specifically rejected the claim of plaintiff that he was entitled to a lien on said fund for attorney’s fees, on the ground that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- STATE BY PARSONS v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Christianson v. King CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Matter of People (Melrose Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. O'malley.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Aetna Insurance v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Jacobs v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Application of People of the State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956