Legal Opinion · Dissent

Partnership 92 West v. Dobrolowicz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 21, 2005Published

1Dissent

Suarez, P.J. (dissenting).

The issue on this appeal is whether a party who, in a written stipulation, reserves her rights with respect to counterclaims should be allowed to pursue the counterclaims where the counterclaims have never been on the calendar, where the counterclaims have not been litigated on the merits and where the adversary has served no notice to resume prosecution as required by CPLR 3216 (b) (3). I find that she should. There is no legal basis for the denial of the motion of Eva Bogushawa Dobrolowicz to place her counterclaims on the calendar for trial. (See Trustees of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Russell Sage CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Batavia Kill Watershed District v. Charles O. Desch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Gargiulo v. OppenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Greenberg v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty v. HeilnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API