Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. Harold L. Martin Distributing Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1999No. 2971300Published

1DissentThompson, Judge

I believe that Williams failed to present substantial evidence indicating that the sidewalk, the curb, or the wheelchair ramp presented a hidden defect that she could not have discovered in the exercise of ordinary care. For that reason, I must respectfully dissent.

Because Williams was an invitee of the defendant Martin Distributing Company, that defendant’s duty was limited to giving Williams notice of hidden defects that were unknown to her and that could not have been discovered by her in the exercise of ordinary care. See Ex parte Mountain Top Indoor Flea Market, Inc., 699 So.2d 158, 161…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Mountain Top Indoor Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Cash v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Ex Parte BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Harvell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Hose v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API