Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Brule County
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1940No. File No. 8342PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P.J.
Predicated upon the theory that the tract known as “King’s Addition” never became a part of the city of Chamberlain, South Dakota, or of the Independent District of Chamberlain, plaintiff brought this action against Brule County, the city, and the school district, on behalf of herself and other owners of property within the questioned addition, seeking to enjoin the levy and collection of municipal and school taxes. Findings, conclusions, and judgment were for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
The city was incorporated by special act of the Legislature of the Territory of Dakota in 1883. On…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Utah & Northern Railway v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Langford v. MonteithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- King v. McAndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Your Food Stores, Inc. (NSL) v. Village of EspanolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. LohnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Patrick v. BlakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. LohnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955