Legal Opinion

Stiles v. City of Lambertville

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 27, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

In pursuance of “An act to establish an excise department in cities of this state,” approved April 8th, 1902 (Pamph. L., p. 628), an ordinance for that purpose was adopted' in the city of Lambertville on March 14-th, 1903, and under it a board of excise commissioners was duly organized. The fourth section of the ordinance provides *91that “in case of the * * * resignation * * * of any member of said board * * * the common council shall appoint another person in his stead.” At a regular meeting of the council, held on August 7th, 1905, a member of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coogan v. BarbourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  2. Baker v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gulnac v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API