Legal Opinion
Frazier v. Harris
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided October 9, 2003No. 03-3007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Renatta Frazier’s Motion to Declare Offer of Judgment Invalid. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is ALLOWED.
On September 17, 2003, Defendant City of Springfield, Illinois (Springfield), and four of the individual Defendants, John W. Harris, William Pittman, Mary L. Vasconcelles, and Mark Harms (collectively the City Defendants), presented Frazier with an offer of judgment purportedly under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 (Proposed Offer). The City Defendants are all represented in this matter by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dennis Webb, Sr. v. Dick James and Dick James Ford, Inc., a Corporation of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Architectural Metal Systems, Incorporated v. Consolidated Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Charles Amati v. City of WoodstockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- A/s Apothekernes Laboratorium for Specialpraeparater v. I.M.C. Chemical Group, Inc. And Dr. M.B. GillisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- A. Eugene Nordby, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anchor Hocking Packaging Company, and Johnson & Bell, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe v. Spartanburg County School District ThreeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016