Legal Opinion

Curtner v. Bank of Jonesboro

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 28, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). Curtner relies for ia reversal of the judgment upon the rule in Hampton Stave Co. v. Gardner (C. C. A.), 154 Fed. 805, where it was. held that, upon a breach by a vendor of a covenant to furnish an abstract of title in a contract which grants a time option to purchase land, the measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the value of the land, and the issue whether or not the vendee would have bought the land if the vendor had furnished the abstract is speculative and immaterial. Without approving that decision as to option…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warren v. StoddartSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Young v. BermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Hampton Stave Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. IvySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ReaganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Lake Village Implement Company v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Quality Truck Equipment Co. v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. WAWAK V. STEWARTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API