Legal Opinion

Fitz v. The Amelie

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided May 15, 1865No. Case No. 4,838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Circuit Justice.

The authority of a master to sell his ship under any circumstances was denied by some of the continental writers upon maritime law, and by some of the early decisions in the courts of the parent country. The reason given for the prohibition was, that such authority, if allowed, would tend to encourage fraud. Tremenhere v. Tresillian, 1 Sid. 452; Johnson v. Shippen. 2 Ld. Raym. 984; Reid v. Darby, 10 East, 143; Abb. Shipp. (5th Ed.) 9; Ekins v. East India Co., 1 P. Wms. 395.

A careful scrutiny of those cases, however, will show that the circumstances in most of them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. CenterCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  2. Prince v. Ocean InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re RipleyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API