Legal Opinion

Kopprasch v. New York Indemnity Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 34,703PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The city of Allegan, employer, and Carl Rambadt, employee, were under the workmen’s compensation act, the defendant New York Indemnity Company carrying the risk. Rambadt suffered an accidential injury under the act. Defendant paid weekly compensation as for total disability and it paid, during the first 90 days after the injury, medical, surgical, and hospital services and medicines as provided by the act.

At the end of the 90-day period Rambadt was in the hospital of plaintiff, a physician and surgeon at Allegan, and his condition was serious and likely to require mu'ch and prolonged care and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leo Austrian & Co. v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Home Life Insurance v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Griggs v. SeldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
  5. Inglish v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richards v. Lowrie & Webb Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Jackson v. GoodmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bauman v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Jackson v. GoodmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Jackson v. GoodmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API