Legal Opinion

Bel-Rose Silk Co. v. Toy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 29, 1937Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wolber, C. C. J.

This is an application made on behalf of Bel-Rose Silk Company, Incorporated, plaintiff in the Supreme Court cause and defendant in the Circuit Court cause, to have the two cases tried together, on the grounds that the issues in both cases and the evidence in support thereof are and will be of necessity substantially the same, the causes of action both arising out of the same transaction, or series of transactions, and that all of the parties in any way connected or associated with the first case are similarly associated and connected with the second case.

The first case is a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  2. Defiance Fruit Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Milberg v. KeutheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. Hubbard v. Montross Metal Shingle Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Borough of Hawthorne v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API