Legal Opinion
Tracey v. Sullivan
New York County Courts
Decided March 5, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
The action is for the recovery of a certain gun or the value thereof which the plaintiff alleges the defendant took from . him by virtue of the provisions of section 169 of the Conservation Law (added by Laws of 1912, chap. 318, as last amd. by Laws of ‘1921, chap. 328). Apparently, the action is one of those contemplated under section 89 of the Justice’s Court Act. The defendant admitted he took the gun from the plaintiff and still retains it but contends that at the time he took said gun he was a duly appointed game protector of the State of New York and' that the gun was seized and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Sanders v. . SoutterNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Atkins v. JudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stark v. Howe Sound Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933
- Zaepfel v. ParnassNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Michigan Alkali Co. v. Bankers Indemnity Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- People ex rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Supreme Court · 1936