Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Jewett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action to recover one half the cost of a party wall. In 1873, the plaintiff made an agreement with one Matthews, who was then the owner of the equity of redemption of the defendant’s land, that the plaintiff might place one half of the division wall of his house on the defendant’s lot; and that Matthews would pay one half of the cost of the wall when he made use of it.

The defendant’s title is under the foreclosure of a mortgage ' existing at the time this agreement was made. The mortgagee was not a party to the agreement, and it is not contended that the defendant is bound by it.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Watertown v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Forster v. ForsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Quinn v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Salisbury Land & Improvement Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Allen v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Schmidt v. LewisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API