Legal Opinion

Smith v. Crook

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1984No. A015680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

The sole question on this appeal is whether the decedent’s natural grandchildren are entitled to share in the estate as pretermitted heirs. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that they are and accordingly reverse the judgment.

Facts

Genevieve Rufran died testate on December 11, 1974, bequeathing her residuary estate to her three surviving children, .respondents herein. The will was duly admitted to probate, and the estate was distributed to the respondents under the terms of the will. Appellants, the surviving children of June R. Smith who predeceased her mother…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re Estate of TrickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API