Legal Opinion

Gupta v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 24, 2017No. 36/16Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rahul Gupta v. State of Maryland, No. 36, September Term, 2016. Opinion by Getty, J. CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE — JURY COMMUNICATIONS Juror’s communication to trial judge’s law clerk that she would be unable to continue serving if trial lasted beyond two weeks “pertained to the action” under Maryland Rule 4- 326(d)(2). Trial judge violated the Rule by responding to juror’s inquiry off the record and without notifying the parties of the communication. However, violation was harmless where trial judge subsequently notified the parties of the juror communication and response, provided the parties…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API