Legal Opinion

O. M. Bilharz Mining Co. v. State Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1928No. 18490PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

This is an appeal from an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of Charles Donison. The award was for the permanent loss of an eye.

But one proposition is presented by petitioners — that is, that there is no competent evidence to sustain the findings of the Commission or the order and award based thereon. The contention is that there is no competent evidence to the effect or tending to prove that the loss of the vision of the left eye of claimant was caused by the accident.

It is conceded by both parties that tbe law is:

“Where there is no evidence to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Courson v. Consolidated Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. United States F. & G. Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. United States Zinc Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Olson Drilling Co. v. TryonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Harvey v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API