Mayo v. North Carolina State University

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, as the terms of the employment agreement were sufficient to permit collection of the *511overpayment found by both the trial court and the administrative law judge. Having so concluded, I would reverse the portion of the trial court’s order that estopped respondent from collection of the overpayment, and affirm the portion of the order allowing respondent to retain funds already collected towards the debt.

Petitioner alleges, and the majority agrees, that respondent is prevented from collecting the overpayment in salary made in July and August of…