Legal Opinion

People v. Cato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that County Court properly determined that defendant violated the conditions of the sentencing commitment. Because defendant violated those conditions, the court was not bound by the sentencing commitment and could impose a greater sentence without providing defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea (see, People v Thompson, 221 AD2d 1016). We further conclude that the enhanced sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Márks, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SpragueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. VaillantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. SPRAGUE, ALVIS D., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API