Legal Opinion
Panther Pumps & Equipment Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 10, 1976No. 67 C 201PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUSTIN, District Judge.
This cause is once again before me following a two-week contempt hearing which took place in April of this year. The Defendant, Mr. Louis Beck, appeared pursuant to this court’s Order to Show Cause, dated February 9,1976. That order directed Beck to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for violating an injunction issued in 1970 following a jury trial. The Plaintiff corporation brought this action for civil contempt because it believed that Beck’s conduct in manufacturing a pump designed for spraying paint constituted a violation of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Berry v. Midtown Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Hart Schaffner & Marx v. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Panther Pumps & Equipment Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Panther Pumps & Equipment Company, Inc., Now Morrison Pump Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc., Paul W. Schlosser and Edward DrathCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Talen's Landing, Inc. v. M/v Venture, Ii, Etc., Venture Towing, Inc., Venture Marine Enterprises, Inc. And Jacques J. CreppelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Equilease Corp. v. M/V SAMSONDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1983