Legal Opinion
Conley v. Valley Motor Transit Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 30, 1943No. 9583PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The Valley Motor Transit Company, a motorbus carrier, formerly operated an electric interurban line along the Ohio River from Steubenville, Ohio, to Beaver, Pa., traversing a distance of 42 miles. Without change in route, "with the same stops and type of traffic, its electrified system was eventually converted to a bus line. The same zones were continued in use and the same fares were charged.
The route of the Transit Company required the operation of its buses in interstate commerce in the States of Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Clifford Conley was employed as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Foster v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. William Groner, D/B/A Lucky DistributorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Casseus v. E. Bus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- State v. StumboSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Gillette v. Rockland Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Mitchell v. Baltimore & Annapolis RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.