Legal Opinion
United States v. Frost
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 21, 2004No. CR-03-40-B-WPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 15, 2004, Defendant Peter David Frost was convicted by a jury of possession of firearms after dishonorable discharge in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(6). On September 29, 2004, the Defendant filed a Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal, and on October 4, 2004, he filed a Pro Se Motion for Transcripts at Government Expense. This Court DENIES both Motions.
II. DISCUSSION
A. Motion for Leave to File in For-ma…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Maloney v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FARZAN v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- FARZAN v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024