Legal Opinion

Clark & Jones, Inc. v. American Mut. Liability Ins.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 5, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 2147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This is an action to recover on a comprehensive crime policy carried by defendant as insurer in favor of plaintiff against defalcation of plaintiff’s employees, the limit of the policy being $25,000, the defalcation resulting in loss to plaintiff being that of Neil Godwin, in the alleged amount of $9,587,50. The complaint says that the insurer was notified of the default and claim made for indemnity, which has been refused. The complaint, as amended, also sets out the coverage provisions relied on, alleges that nonpayment is in bad faith, for reason of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tom Love Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Snell v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Trousdale ex rel. McNichol v. PhilipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Wheeler v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  5. White v. German National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LeongHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. George Hileman, and Michigan State Accident Fund, and v. Northwest Engineering Company, a Foreign Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  3. Clark & Jones, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API