Legal Opinion
Rose v. O'Linn
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to the district court for Washington county. Tried below before Savage, J..
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
The plaintiff in this ease assigns for error the giving of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th instructions, which are in the following words:
“4. If it was simply an agreement to pay it — if some other party primarily liable did not — it was what is called a collateral promise or a promise to answer for the debt or default of another, and consequently void by what is known as our statute of frauds, for not being in writing.
*365“ 5. Illustration of original and collateral promises may be given as follows, which you will understand are merely illustrations: If a person says, £ Go to that pauper and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
3Cited by5 opinions
- West v. GraingerSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Morrissey v. KinseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Waters v. ShaferNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnson v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- De Witt v. RootNebraska Supreme Court · 1886