Legal Opinion

Olson v. Toce

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 2017No. 17-36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREMILLION, Judge.

|-i The plaintiff-applicant, Laureen Olson, applied for supervisory writs with this court following the trial court’s grant of the exceptions of vagueness, ambiguity, and prematurity filed by the Louisiana Patient Compensation . Fund Oversight Board (the PCF) in response to her Petition for Approval of Settlement of Medical Malpractice Claim pursuant to La.R.S. *77740:1231.4.1 We called up the writ and requested supplemental briefing and argument. For the following reasons, the writ is granted, and the ruling of the trial court is reversed, The matter is remanded for proceedings…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Langlois v. Allied Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. Syrie v. SchilhabSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Graves v. PageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  4. Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical CenterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laureen Olson v. Kenneth SchnauderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Laureen Olson v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Laureen Olson v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board; Kenneth Schnauder and Kurt LoupLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API