Parslow v. United States
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
This action was commenced and tried before the Court under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 60 Stat. 842, 61 Stat. 722, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. The evidence vigorously presented by the respective parties at the trial of the action creates the usual distressing dilemma for the court to decide extremely close factual questions. It is the typical situation where honest witnesses differ as to important facts, where admissions were said to be made by one side and emphatically denied by the party against whom the alleged admission is directed. It is the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gangi v. . FradusNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Backus v. SevernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Quinn v. EckelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Quinn v. EckelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Theil v. RadetzkyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.