Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 2, 2003No. 1037-02PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, P.J.

in which WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

We granted review to determine the proper harm analysis to apply when a trial judge uses an improper hypothetical in voir dire to illustrate a proposition of law.1 We will reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

A. Background

1. The facts

Dennis Earl Hass was killed during a robbery. Appellant was indicted for the capital murder of Haas but was convicted of the lesser-included offense of aggravated robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment. That conviction was reversed and the case was remanded for a new trial. The…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by59 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Nava, Andres MaldonadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API