Taylor v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, P.J.
in which WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
We granted review to determine the proper harm analysis to apply when a trial judge uses an improper hypothetical in voir dire to illustrate a proposition of law.1 We will reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
A. Background
1. The facts
Dennis Earl Hass was killed during a robbery. Appellant was indicted for the capital murder of Haas but was convicted of the lesser-included offense of aggravated robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment. That conviction was reversed and the case was remanded for a new trial. The…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by59 opinions
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Nava, Andres MaldonadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.